CSS vs CSS3
CSS:
- The CSS was to focus on formatting features. They have capabilities for positioning texts and objects.CSS is backward compatible with CSS3.
- CSS does not support responsive design.
- CSS is not divided into modules.
- Cannot produce 3D animation and transformation.
- The developers designed some images that looked like rounded corners with the structures and backgrounds. Designing a border and uploading the design to the server.
- CSS is slower.
- Animations are written in JavaScript and JQuery. It has not to design layer features and page elements and no special effects such as shadowing text, text animation, etc.
- Multi-column text blocks are defined in CSS3
CSS3:
- When CSS3 code is written in CSS, and it is invalid. CSS3 makes the Web Pages more attractive. It takes less time to create a page.
- CSS3 is the latest version and it supports responsive design.
- CSS3 could split into modules.
- In CSS3 animation and 3D transformations are used. The elements are moved across the screen with the assistance of JavaScript and flash. By using the elements, also be ready to change the size and color.
- In CSS3, the adds text-shadows to make it easy and effective. Add words for the visual effects of the break line, comfortable fit inside the column. the CSS3 changes the size and color of the text.
- CSS3 is faster than CSS.
- CSS3 supports HSL RGBA, HSLA and the gradient colors.
- CSS supports single text blocks.